УДК 329.12
Фишман Л.Г.
Социалистические буржуазные добродетели // Вестник Томского государственного университета. Философия. Социология. Политология. 2020. № 58. С. 255-263. DOI: 10.17223/1998863Х/58/23.
список ВАК
Рассматриваются официальные советские представления о моральных качествах, требующихся человеку социалистического общества. Обосновывается, что в плане совокупности добродетелей объективные различия между социалистическими и буржуазными требованиями к человеку были не слишком велики. Отличия буржуазного и социалистического моральных кодексов были обусловлены главным образом различиями в их идеологической «надстройке».
*Статья подготовлена при поддержке Программы фундаментальных и прикладных научных исследований «Этнокультурное многообразие российского общества и укрепление общероссийской идентичности» 2020-2022 гг. (проект «Общественное согласие в России и конструирование гражданской идентичности как способ его достижения», рук. академик РАН В.Н. Руденко).
The article attempts to answer the question: why did the citizens of the late USSR expect that a return to bourgeois virtues would not be a big problem? Why did the citizens of the late USSR assume that it would not be too difficult for a Soviet person to adopt “normal” bourgeois moral attitudes? In this regard, the author analyzes the official Soviet ideas about the moral qualities required from a person in a socialist society. The article justifies that, in terms of the totality of virtues, the objective differences between the ideal-typical socialist and bourgeois requirements for a person were not too great. One can see that bourgeois examples of moral behavior are multi-component combinations of virtues, most of which have exactly the same relation to the ideal-typical “bourgeois” as to the “socialist”. In fact, it is recognized that the norms of bourgeois morality themselves may be higher than bourgeois practice and legislation. The fact that fight for communism was the main principle of communist morality did not mean rejecting bourgeois virtues, which look quite acceptable. It was necessary to abandon the economic basis (the domination of private property) and the political and ideological superstructure that distort these virtues. Thus, the differences between the bourgeois and socialist moral codes were mainly due to differences in their ideological “superstructure”. This is confirmed by the analysis of such significant documents for assessing the official content of Soviet morality as the textbook "Historical Materialism" or "The Moral Code of the Builder of Communism". All this has led to a relatively conflict-free transition from Soviet Russia to Capitalist Russia.
Полный текст>>